The revolution has been televised….Black in America baby….

A government bureaucrat making med decisions is no worse than a private bureaucrat…and has no interest in making a fat profit.

If that’s true, how come so many come out of D.C. a whole lot richer than when they went in?

I don’t disagree on the insurance companies or the pharmaceuticals and what they do. However, I don’t believe an untrustworthy government is the answer. If it can’t be managed at a state level and remain solvent (Tenncare for one example), how will it do in a much further removed governmental body with the crooks who are there?

I’ll pray for your Dad. If the health care passes, he won’t have to worry about insurance anymore but then, he probably won’t get to live much longer, either. Some choices, huh?

And yes, the death panels are in there. Not the literal words, but the definition of it is. So is “rationing” in there by definition if not the literal word. I’ve got the house bill and a line by line list with which to work.

Beck has opinions. He doesn’t tell anybody else how to think but he’s unashamed about sharing his own opinion. BTW, on Monday, his first day back from vacation while that 160,000 member group was doing their level best to get him canned, he netted a little over 2.8 million viewers.

Also, you should really look into the background of those “sponsors” who “pulled” their advertising.

Oh, one more thing… that fellow who died last night is the one who wrote your drug prescription plan and who has his fingerprints all over every piece of major legislation coming out of Congress. Perhaps you should take some time to look at who your pharmaceuticals really feed before blaming it on anybody but them. You should also look at who is really fed by the special interest groups and lobbyists.

Perhaps a lot of people are looking at the way Republicans are handling things in Washington and shaking their heads at the “party of no” but it’s kind of funny that now that they’re no longer providing cover for the Democrats how much light is being shed on what has been going on for a long long time.

The point is not whether anybody likes or dislikes Beck. The point is the attempted interference of someone’s right to that amendment you exercised so easily in opposition.

Not to mention the interference with others in that attempt to prevent someone from exercising one of their civil rights.

You don’t have to like Beck and you don’t have to like Fox to know this is very wrong. If you can’t defend that right for someone other than yourself, who will defend you when it’s your turn?

There’s this thing called the Golden Rule that says do unto others as you would have them do unto you. Our leaders should be leading as examples of this rule. Since what they’re doing is pretty mean and nasty, I suppose when the political pendulum swings back the other way, we should treat them as they’re treating us now?