Questions for Oakland Airport
If there is ever a reason for the military to come to your aid because someone has attacked your city, should they treat you as you have treated them? Perhaps they should cordon you off , make you wait as you have done to them, and treat you like terrorists as you have done to the military?
Michelle Malkin has the low down on these lowlifes: NBC: Ginning up anti-war sentiment; Plus: No more military charters through Oakland?
Can I be ashamed that I have to call them Americans? If we have any posts or bases of any kind left in California, the next time the government decides it needs to close a few, let’s start with them.
You remember those old science fiction movies depicting a catostrophic earthquake that pushes California right out to sea, sometimes even submerging it under? I’d wish for the one that makes it an island… preferrably with enough sea between it and the rest of the states that we can defend our borders without needing their cooperation at all. Must be all that smog flowing from China that makes them so assinine and self-centered.
Oh, but they support the troops, right? Isn’t that what Nancy Pelosi says all the time? Granted she’s not from Oakland but, truthfully, Oakland is but the latest example of California’s support for the troops.
October 8th, 2007 at 4:37 pm
More confusion. See http://www.insidebayarea.com/argus/localnews/ci_7063381 for more detail. As I understand it, the TSA (those loveable cretins that frisk old ladies at the concourse) heard there was an ‘incoming flight with weapons’. Other than a rallying point for Malkin’s sycophants, there is no more to the story. As far as the place shutting down for military flights, I can find nothing. But, if there is, I join you in disgust at such
treatment for our fighting men.
October 8th, 2007 at 5:47 pm
BB, here is where it started:
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=Mjk1NDAxMWZjNDhhODI2Mjc5Nzk1MWMzNWIyYTI0NjY=
Not once, but twice, they subjected those marines to that treatment.
Michelle Malkin just picked up on it like everyone else and has kept up with updates where everybody else read the initial postings and moved on to something else. She does get a bit intense in her reporting but then so do a lot of other reporters and I’ve yet to see a lie. If something is inaccurate, she updates with corrections right on the post, not buried on page 10 or something.