Liberalism or Just Furiosity?
I have to admit I’ve been rather furious for a few weeks now. More so than usual and it seems to be a constant state lately. Usually fury subsides after a short amount of time but before I can become unfurious, our government does something else equally stupid, equally dangerous, or equally treasonous to that which put me in that state in the first place, such as the recent vote on the SChip bill in the House of Representatives.
I often wonder how liberals would handle such fury if they should gain full control over the government and begin to institute policies according to their socialist agenda. The following article gives us a good idea of how they’d handle it.
Bush-haters endure tough week
By Larry Elder
I did it again — opened my mouth.
I drove behind a car carrying two guys. Their bumper sticker read, “War Is Not the Answer.” I knew better, but I pulled up next to them at a red light, rolled down my window, and said, “OK. If war is not the answer, what is?”
“Peace!” the driver angrily responded.
“Just curious,” I said, “do you think people in Tehran drive around with bumper stickers like that?”
“So you support the war?!” his passenger shouted.
Gee, I thought, what a sudden change of topics. All I wanted to know, if war is not the answer, then what is?
“Which war?” I said. “Iraq? Afghanistan? World War II? The Civil War? Can you be a little more specific?”
The passenger turned purple. “The war in Iraq! And where are the weapons of mass destruction?”
“Look,” I said, “I’ve got some bumper stickers in my trunk that say, ‘Beheading Is Not the Answer.’ Would you guys like a couple?”
“F—- off!” they said in unison. Their car roared off.
Ah, yet another example of the “return to civility” after the Democrats’ recapture of Congress. But my “antagonist’s” question about the weapons of mass destruction raises an interesting point. Suppose we actually located stockpiles of WMD, whether in Iraq or discovering Saddam shipped them out — possibly to Syria — before, during and after the invasion. Would the Bush anti-war critics support the Iraq war? Who knows? But a friend told me something that provides a clue.
Recall that for a brief period of time, our military did, in fact, locate WMD. The story almost immediately became discounted, as the “WMD” turned out to be old and worn, unlikely to pose any threat. My friend, an actor, told me that he and several other actors were on a set working together. One said, “F—-, they found the WMD!” Not, “Hey, I might have to reconsider my opposition to the war because our military found WMD.” Or, “I feel relieved about the war, the president was right.” Or, “The discovery of the WMD shows that we did, indeed, face the possibility of Saddam handing off the WMD to a terrorist or even using the stuff himself on America or American interests.” But, no. The near-unanimous reaction — my friend kept his mouth shut — was, “That bleeping Bush was right.”
Read the Full Article Here.
Nominally, the article is about Bush, his successes, and how the liberals responded to those successes. However, I tend to think there are huge problems on the left when they counter questions with verbal assault rather than answers. If they can’t rise to the challenge of such questions with ridiculing or otherwise verbally assaulting the questioner, what makes us think they will be able to guide this country in any fruitful way?
We have become an extremely polarized and furious nation.
Mr. Elder asked a question, “If war is not the answer, what is?”
According to those sporting the bumper sticker, the answer is, “F___ off.”
Okay, now, let’s go tell it to all those jihadists in the Middle East.
August 6th, 2007 at 10:31 pm
I would tend to think the exact same thing, but the problem is that those two people in the car don’t represent the whole left.
War isn’t the answer. It can be an answer, but it doesn’t have to be the answer.
The fact that Larry Elders is able to use the WMDs to justify anything is really sad. There were no WMDs and I don’t believe Cheney when he says that “that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction”. There were tons of doubt. They just didn’t care to listen to them or tell us about them.
The fact that we can’t have any solutions beyond “the war” is really sad. The the Jihadist dictate what we have to respond is also really sad.
August 7th, 2007 at 2:10 am
You know, I am so sick of hearing that there were no WMD found. The fact of the matter is that Saddam himself wanted the world to believe that he had them. He wanted his neighbors to believe that he had them. He could have cleared up any misconceptions at any time by allowing the inspectors in. Instead, he chose to let the world believe he was in possession of them. He was willing to let his people endure yet another war. He was willing to bet his life on it. It was his choice, not ours.
Did he have them? Did he move them? Was he bluffing? We may never know but does it really matter? The left acts as if they are certain the weapons Saddam died for didn’t exist. They ‘know’ they weren’t moved to Syria or buried in the sand. I guess I’m just not willing to bet my life or the lives of our future generations on it.
Btw Steph, how’s the a/c?
August 7th, 2007 at 11:40 am
Christi, the a/c is working fine and… I fixed it myself… once I learned there was a coil inside the house, too…
The way the unit is installed you can’t see anything but flat metal when you change out the filters.
AC, he didn’t use WMDs to justify anything. Look at the article again. It’s about tolerance and civility… what liberals define as PC… something they preach while they don’t engage in such themselves.
August 8th, 2007 at 12:44 am
I like Larry Elder. He tells it like it is. I get so annoyed with all those peace-spouting liberals. Sure, peace would be great. However, as you said, those jihadists aren’t looking for peace. You have to fight fire with fire.
August 8th, 2007 at 3:44 pm
Madeline, I was impressed with that article. It’s the first of his that I’ve read. Thanks for stopping by.